Imagination: the poor man's internet
Because it is. I don't want to hang out in my office because Crazy Cougar Receptionist shares it, and being a witness to her phonyness as she sifts for gossip to spread to others is grating. Besides, I want to learn who's around on this shift.
So I patrol. And patrol and patrol and patrol. But it's silly, because there are still people around, and I'm mostly there for when the people aren't around.
Plus, people are starting to ask me where Barney has gone. Is he on vacation?
"No," I say, "he's pursuing other options." Barney didn't want me to say much about the whole thing, so until I hear from someone who can actually tell me what went on, I'm not saying squat except that Barney's gone and not coming back.
He didn't tell anybody but a handful of people at the site, it seems, and to each of them he told something different. This will be interesting.
I'm finding it more and more telling that not only are all of the client's representatives on vacation (and were last week when this went down), so are the managers with my security company that have my site as part of their domain. Call me paranoid, but that's all awfully convenient, isn't it?
I mean, everybody that Barney could possibly appeal to or complain to about this is simply gone at the time it happened.
Ah well.
On Monday, I had a guy sent to me to be trained for the graveyard, my old shift.
He seems likable enough, and is kind of a cross between Ralph Macchio and Sylvester Stallone. He showed up with his girlfriend (minus points) but it turns out she also works for my company and she was just coming along for the trip. She didn't actually come inside (points added). He forgot to bring his tie (minus points) but he did bring his notebook (BIG points added).
He used to be in construction. But he gave that up (he says) after a small concrete wall fell on him, pinning him in such a manner that he was kissing his ankles with the weight on his back.
In addition, a concrete form (a wall of wood and rebar) fell on him, crushing his leg. And to finish his trio of work stories, he said he was picking up junk after a construction job and when he picked up a bunch of discarded rebar, a piece jumped up and stabbed up into the soft area under his chin, with such force that it demolished some teeth.
So he came to do security work, because it's safer.
He's worked for us for about a month, apparently. Right away they started him in mobile, but he left that after a week or two, since he didn't like doing the Hastings run.
For those not familiar with Vancouver, East Hastings has a (not entirely without merit, but overblown nonetheless) reputation for being a place where a disproportionately large amount of trouble happens. It's one street in an area where there are lots of economically disadvantaged people, homeless people, rampant drug use, et cetera.
For what it's worth, and not that I've often had reason to be there, I've never felt any less safe walking there than anywhere else.
Anyway, he was doing the night shift where you'd have to zap to a building, do a patrol (logging pipe points) then zap off to the next, and so on. Plus alarm responses. He found it too stressful, so he opted out.
Then they bounced him around to various undesirable sites for a bit, then my shift became available and he was available to work graveyards. So I get him.
He seems nice, and he's travelled (big bonus in my opinion, since I tend to equate that with slightly broader perspectives and I also wish I'd done more of that myself) in Europe quite a bit (he's got family there), he's been married and divorced, and is about my age. Which is to say, not too old to take a little direction.
I had four hours to train him, and damned if he didn't get lost every time we went to the second floor.
This is common, especially when it's deserted and the lights are off. The building is really two buildings, with connecting bridges between them and the entire floor is a maze of cubicles. And I mean a maze - there are no obvious connecting paths or anything. There are no landmarks, and all views into the central atrium are equally lacking in perspective.
At least when you're not used to it. ;)
When it was to be our last patrol together, I had him lead me on a typical patrol. We spent the better part of an hour on the second floor alone, because he kept going around and around on it. Sometimes in mini-loops as he got lost in the maze, and sometimes around the entire level because he couldn't remember where the elevators were.
After that, I got to leave him on his own for eight hours.
I read his report, and he did reasonably regular patrols. When he came in for the next night, he said that he got lost a few times, but he's slowly figuring it out.
He pegged the Crazy Cougar Receptionist and the Cafeteria Lady as probing gossips all on his own, and was glad that I'd advised him to play dumb if anybody questioned him about anything.
Not that he has to be a mute idiot, just that information should flow to him, not from him.
Besides, he doesn't know who he can talk to without it biting him in the ass, or what's acceptable. He seems able to pull this off.
Buffalo Kisser isn't sure about him, so he says when I asked what he thought of the new guy. "That guy says 'Shut up!' and 'No WAY!' too much." Buffalo Kisser opines.
He's right, that's what the guy does. It's his version of the "uh huh" and "oh, really" that people do to show polite interest in what you're saying.
But watching this guy laugh is a delight. I told him some security stories (not about any of the people he's going to meet on this site, of course) and he just split himself laughing. I mean, tears and irregular breathing and all that.
And last night, when he was telling me about the people he met on shift, he couldn't remember their names but when he described them I'd imitate them (I'm a passable mimic, for both voice and mannerism) and he's kill himself at the caricatures I was rendering. I think that he'll fit in fine socially at this site, although he's a little aggressive about talking to people. The body language of someone who is working late or just woke up usually tells you they don't want to have to deal with YOU, but he goes right on over and asks how they are.
Not my style, but he'll work it out.
DiceGimp is even angrier with me now.
I'd have thought that after he unloaded last week why he was upset, that would make him feel better. But I guess that me buying The Romanian's monitor (he wasn't mad at The Romanian for selling it to me, but he was furious that I'd bought it. Go fig) on the heels of him being upset pushed him into an entirely new realm.
The Romanian explained to him that it was still for sale, and that I was just speeding up the process since The Romanian couldn't wait any longer (over two months DiceGimp has been promising to buy that thing), but he didn't care. All manner of nasty stuff is coming out of his mouth to whoever will listen, which basically means The Romanian and Buffalo Kisser. Both of which immediately tell me, of course.
But now I'm on a different shift, so the dude doesn't have to see me except for those fifteen minutes or so when I'm leaving and he's showing up. And now he makes a point of running away if he thinks I might approach, like when I was taking the new guy (haven't got a good nickname for him yet) out to meet him and Buffalo Kisser.
Interestingly, when I was asking the new guy how his first shift went, and if he got along with the bike patrol guys, he said that Buffalo Kisser is cool and fun to talk to, but that DiceGimp is... (he trailed off) ... different.
I asked what he meant, and he said "Just the way he talks... it's like 'Dude, could you hurry it up? I've got a patrol to do..".
See? I told you he spoke in endless and pointless detail about things! Independant confirmation! Of course, you only have my word that it's true... :P
Now, a news article and a picture. If you're at all a sensitive type, you'll want to avoid the picture. It involves a fetus, or part of one, and I'm hiding it behind a link. So be warned!
First the article, though.
From the New York Times comes the Scientific Savvy? In U.S., Not Much article.
While scientific literacy has doubled over the past two decades, only 20 to 25 percent of Americans are "scientifically savvy and alert," he [Dr. Jon D. Miller] said in an interview. Most of the rest "don't have a clue." At a time when science permeates debates on everything from global warming to stem cell research, he said, people's inability to understand basic scientific concepts undermines their ability to take part in the democratic process.
Whoo-ee! He said a mouthful! But an accurate mouthful, that's for sure. My mom inadvertantly summed this very point up thirteen or fourteen years ago when she came into the family room where my brother and I were discussing/debating/arguing about environmental issues. I think specifically we were talking about carbon monoxide emissions and the long-term effects thereof.
She paused for long enough to hear what were were talking about, and said something along the lines of "I wish everybody (world at large) would stop endlessly arguing about the enviroment!"
Astonished, I said "Mom, where do you think the exhaust from your car goes?"
She snapped back "Up into the sky and disappears!"
A moment passes.
Then she said, and I've never forgotten this, "Well, I know that's not true, but that's what were were taught when I was in school."
Mom's a good egg. She recognised that she didn't actually know, and that was pretty cool. And she's not dumb either, it was just something she hadn't encountered as being relevant to her.
Years later, she was resistant to the idea of recycling, but once she understood the why's of it (I guess growing up in an era where the world was a big place and vistas seemed endless shapes a certain way of thinking that doesn't necessarily prepare you for environmental awareness) she was the most dilligent trash-sorter you ever met.
But if there had been a vote or referendum about vehicle emissions at that time, what would she have based her decision on?
That's not a dis, but it's a fair question provoked by the article.
Dr. Miller's data reveal some yawning gaps in basic knowledge. American adults in general do not understand what molecules are (other than that they are really small). Fewer than a third can identify DNA as a key to heredity. Only about 10 percent know what radiation is. One adult American in five thinks the Sun revolves around the Earth, an idea science had abandoned by the 17th century.
As he goes on to say, this kind of ignorance may not have mattered much for the nation's public life. You could still be an effective citizen. But nowadays, with acid rain, nuclear power, infectious diseases and more, that's no longer the case.
I found the second to last paragraph of the article interesting as well:
Lately, people who advocate the teaching of evolution have been citing Dr. Miller's ideas on what factors are correlated with adherence to creationism and rejection of Darwinian theories. In general, he says, these fundamentalist views are most common among people who are not well educated and who "work in jobs that are evaporating fast with competition around the world."
Note he said most and not all. No need to tell me about your cousin with the engineering degree who believes in a literal interpretation of Genesis. :P
Now, the picture:
A sculpture made with the pickled head of a dead fetus attached to a seagull's body, which is part of a Chinese art exhibition in Switzerland has pissed the usual people off. Have a gander here.